
California voters support keeping daylight saving time throughout the year, but USC researchers say that might not be a good idea. (Photo/iStock)
Is year-round daylight saving time a good idea? Maybe not
A USC expert confirms the biological challenges of the time change; if anything, we should be on standard time all year.
This story was originally published on March 19, 2019, and has been updated.
If the switch to and from daylight saving time has you yawning more than usual, you aren’t alone.
It takes some people a full week to recover from feeling more sluggish than usual after rolling back the clock for daylight saving time. Experts call the phenomenon “social jet lag.”
Much like the jet lag we experience after flying across time zones, losing an hour upsets our circadian rhythm. That not only throws off our sleep schedule but actually has impacts on the cellular level, since many biological functions are timed to that clock.
“It really messes people up,” said Steve Kay, the director of the USC Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience who is considered one of the preeminent experts in circadian rhythm.
“It affects human performance. The data has been clear in terms of traffic accidents and there’s also data that it’s not great in terms of cardiovascular health: Heart attacks go up.”
In California, daylight saving time could become year-round after voters in 2018 approved Proposition 7. The ballot measure allows the state legislature to make daylight saving time permanent — provided federal law is changed to allow the move.
Research shows there are all kinds of health concerns when it comes to circadian disruption. When experienced long term, as is the case with night shift workers, an individual’s likelihood to develop obesity, Type 2 diabetes or cancer increases, according to USC experts.
OSHA includes daylight saving time side effects in its trainings, since workplace accidents increase by about 6 percent.
Some proponents of the proposition brought up the health concerns, such as upticks in traffic accidents and heart attacks, but USC experts say they’re missing the mark. Permanent daylight saving time wouldn’t solve this issue; instead, it would prolong it — adding more days of social jet lag to the year.
Year-round daylight saving time and cellular function
A recent study by Kay and his team showed that circadian disruption changed the way cells function to the point of increasing disease risk, including cancer.
It’s also a change that could disportionately impact teenagers, whose clocks are biologically shifted to wake up later. When they sleep in late on the weekends, it’s not just lethargy — it’s biology, Kay said. That’s the reason some schools are shifting their start times. A study showed students got 34 minutes more sleep, on average, when school started later.
“As we age, our biological clocks shift earlier,” Kay said.
If anything, Kay says, California should consider switching permanently to standard time, like Hawaii and Arizona. The Society for Research of Biological Rhythms penned a letter to the author of Proposition 7 in support of that. Although it would mean earlier nights, it would address the health implications associated by starting your day in darkness.
“Our highly evolved circadian lifestyle is making us ill,” Kay wrote in a recent paper. “Humans are not evolved for night shifts, nighttime lights and intercontinental travel. Modern life challenges to our circadian system present a long-term threat to our health.”